Tuesday, April 24

Worst Drafts

The lottery is drawing closer, and with it comes rampant speculation on who the Sonics should select.

I thought it makes a great opportunity to review the Sonics’ draft history, specifically the worst drafts in team history. I also thought it would be a good chance to mention Billy Paultz in an article for no good reason whatsoever.

Here you go:

1970: With a first-rounder and two seconds you’d think the Sonics could do better than Jim Ard, Jake Ford, and Pete Cross. Sadly, the Sonics pass up John Johnson, Geoff Petrie, Jim McMillan, Calvin Murphy, Tiny Archibald, Billy Paultz (The Whopper!), and Dan Issel.

1972: Again, the Sonics have a first and two seconds, and, again, they come up empty, unless you consider Bud Stallworth, Joby Wright, and Brian Taylor as significant acquisitions. Taylor had a decent career in the ABA, but he never played a game in Seattle. (On a side note, the draft lasted for 14 rounds; the Sonics didn’t get anything in the other 12 rounds either).

1975: The Sonics reach for Frank Oleynick with the 12th pick of the first round. Oleynick’s sole claim to fame was attending Seattle U. Maybe the Sonics figured they could save on airfare. Also available at that pick were: Ricky Sobers, Joe Bryant, Kevin Grevey, Gus Williams, World B Free, and Dan Roundfield.

1978: Coming off a berth in the NBA Finals, you couldn’t expect much in the draft, but considering that of the five guys the Sonics picked, only one of them (Ralph Drollinger, UCLA) even played in the league, and Drollinger’s “career” consisted of six games played, well, that’s not much of a draft, folks.

1981: “With the fifth overall selection in the NBA Draft, the Seattle Supersonics select ...” Danny Vranes? Considering the Sonics could have wound up with Tom Chambers, Orlando Woolridge, Rolando Blackman, Kelly Tripucka, Danny Schayes, Larry Nance, Danny Ainge, or Eddie Johnson (the good one), that’s just lame.

1994: With an upper-echelon pick for the first time in a while, Seattle goes for Carlos Rogers with the 11th pick. Of course, they could have had Jalen Rose, but who had heard of him?

2004-2006: We will not mention these seasons.

11 comments:

t dawg said...

I'm still unwilling to write off 04-06 simply because big men take time to develop, and all 3 are very young with potential.

Example-- http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jermaine_oneal/career_stats.html

Nearly all young bigs take time to develop. Unfortunately, we don't want to end up being the Portland in this deal, maturing players for other teams to take advantage of.

The worst Sonic pick ever?
how about Rich King?
Richard Thomas (Rich) King (born April 4, 1969 in Lincoln, Nebraska) is an American former professional basketball player who was selected by the Seattle SuperSonics in the 1st round (14th overall) of the 1991 NBA Draft out of the University of Nebraska. A 7'2", 260-lb. center, King played four seasons with the Sonics, appearing in a total of 72 games and averaging 1.9 ppg.

That is futility.

Others available:

Anthony Avent
-had 1 decent year (his rookie year, averaged almost 10)

Chris Gatling
-a long solid journeyman career)

LeBradford Smith
-better than King, but not by much. Huge potential (was Gatorade HS PoY), never reached. But at least he HAD potential.

LeRon Ellis
-decent career despite injuries)

Stanley Roberts
-if you pick a longshot center at least pick a talented one)

Rick Fox
-better player than actor, but not by much.

Bobby Phills
- was really playing well when killed in a car crash.

Isaac Austin
-again, a brief level of success, but another big man with more potential than King.

Ricard Dumas
-started well but drugs destroyed his career-- still he had at least a decent season first).

Elliot Perry had a couple decent seasons as a back up PG. So did Chris Corchiani for that matter.
And in the back up PG mold, Doug Overton was also in this draft and simply refuses to go away.

All in all, what, at least 10 players who would have contributed more than King, many of which went well into the 2nd round.

Gabe said...

how about the pippen for polynice trade? are we counting that? that one really worked out for us. too bad the bulls couldnt figure out how to accomplish anything with pippen...

Nuss said...

Both good comments.

I thought about including Rich King, but if you look at his college numbers he wasn't a disaster. Plus, if you have to use Anthony Avent to back up your point, well, that's not exactly too great of a point, is it? (just kidding) Still, it can't be argued that King was a horrible pro. Maybe I'll make him an honorable mention.

As for Pippen and Polynice, the Sonics wound up selecting McKey in that draft, as well as getting the rights to Polynice. If they got 2 guys like McKey and O.P. in every draft, the Sonics would win the title every year. Trading Polynice for Pippen was a horrible move in hindsight, but if you can close your eyes to that catastrophe, the guys they got were good pros.

To me, the absolute worst draft is 1978, when the Sonics picked 5 guys and they combined to play 6 games in the league, and those 6 games came for the expansion Dallas Mavericks. Just awful.

Anonymous said...

Richard Dumas! Ike Austin!

That's all I've got to say.

t dawg said...

they did epitomize the "better to burn out than fade away" aspect of athletics.

Ike cause he was lazy... Dumas, though, I had forgotten about until I did a little wikipedia research. Remembered him instantly when I heard the name. He was a stud athlete.

Sad.

Not as sad as Ricky Berry, who was picked by Sacramento in 1988.

Remember him?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Berry

t dawg said...

Now I've been looking over old drafts most of the day-- question-- Why wasn't Fennis Dembo a better pro? Was it on or off the court issues?

What about Harold "the show" Arcenaeux <-- sp?

Gerold Honeycutt? <--sp?

Felipe "SI Cover as a HS Senior" Lopez?



Both were classic small school NCAA tourney stars that seemed to have potential but never went anywhere.

redickulous said...

I did some research and think the your conclusion that "Frank Oleynick’s sole claim to fame was attending Seattle U. Maybe the Sonics figured they could save on airfare" is lazy and not really fair; Oleynick, the 1st round pick of the Sonics in 1975, had an impressive career at (then Division 1) Seattle University:
G FG% FT% PPG
26 49.1 81.6 25.1
26 49.5 88.8* 27.3
All-American selection, *1st in the nation.

he averaged 6ppg for the Sonics his rookie season.

redickulous said...

My choice for Worst draft pick? it's over 14 feet long: a tie between Mohammed Sene and/or Robert Swift!

Anonymous said...

We guarantee we provide the cheapest ghd, ghd Hair Straighteners,ghd straighteners, ghd hair tools in the market and 100% Quality Guarantee.

buy uggs said...

ugg outlet
ugg black
buy uggs
ugg boots
ugg outlet http://www.uggsoutletstores.org
ugg black http://www.blackuggonsale.com
buy uggs http://www.buy-uggs-online.com
ugg boots http://www.donuggboots.com

tony liang said...

Fitch store in general Abercrombie And Fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - Abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the abercrombie is obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand Abercrombie and Fitch Hoodies, including Abercrombie And Fitch Clothing and Abercrombie and Fitch JeansAbercrombie and Fitch PantsAbercrombie and Fitch Tees. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, Abercrombie and Fitch Sweaters is all over the world, of course, is also expected to Abercrombie and Fitch Shorts.
New Year was coming, everyone wants new clothes to disguise themselves,Abercrombie Clothing is a good choice. BecauseAbercrombie Sale is a well-known brand, Abercrombie and Fitch Outerwearseverywhere, abercrombie is very much a Cheap Abercrombie. There has Abercrombie and Fitch Polos, Abercrombie Womens and Abercrombie and Fitch Shirts. Personally, I'm looking forward to Abercrombie Hollister's 2009 New Arrivals, such as Abercrombie Ruehl No.925 like this style.