Monday, April 6

Not Quite Right

Last year, a friend of mine recommended I read Daniel Yergin's "The Prize," an exhaustive study of the petroleum industry, from the 1800s to today. (How exhaustive? Try 928 pages.)

After slogging through the first quarter of the book, I came to Yergin's analysis of World War I, and how oil played a role in that horrific bloodbath. I was especially interested, in that I had spent the past year reading every book I could on WWI (don't ask; I get obsessed with weird topics sometimes).

Sadly, Yergin's focus on tanks and supply lines was totally out of whack with the facts, and it ruined the rest of the book for me. While previous to that point of the story I was swallowing everything he wrote, all subsequent chapters came with hesitation in my eyes. After all, if he could be so wrong about the section which I knew alot about, how wrong was he about the rest?

That's a rather long-winded reference to this piece from ESPN's Tom McKean at TrueHoop today. McKean compiles a list of teams that failed to win championships despite posting phenomenal regular season records over an extended period of time.

And, yes, your favorite basketball team is right there, sandwiched between the Blazers and the Knicks. I won't repeat everything McKean wrote (you should read the article in its entirety), but I will copy this portion:

In 1996, Seattle reached the NBA Finals, but fell to the Bulls in 6 games. During that era, to be the best, a team most likely had to go through Chicago, and the problem was that Seattle was 4-12 against the Bulls between 1991-98 when Michael Jordan played, including playoff games.

[emphasis added]

To which my astonished inner reader responded, "Uh, come again?" Is his contention that the reason the Sonics failed to win a championship during George Karl's tenure was Michael Jordan?

Think back to that time frame. When Wally Walker canned Karl, was it because he lost to the Bulls in the NBA Finals, or because the Sonics imploded in the first round so often? Obviously, it was the latter, right?

I don't mean to belittle McKean's article, and I'm sure he spent a considerable amount of time culling together candidates for the story, but, as I did when reading The Prize last year, I was left with a slightly bewildered and disappointed feeling after I read it. If he can be that wrong about a crucial element of the Sonics' failure, how wrong is he about the rest of the article?

5 comments:

Hacksaw said...

There's a chance you might be reading the story wrong and/or reading too much into a fluff piece.

The subtitle of the article claims that McKean is looking at "elite NBA teams that never won titles". The Sonics of the mid-90's are certainly a fit given their gaudy regular season winning percentage.

As to the CHI/SEA reference, McKean isn't referencing the record vs. the Bulls as a reason Karl got fired, but rather it seems, as a point tagged on at the end to help explain why they didn't win a title during the mid-90's.

It is certainly fair to say that the Sonics' poor record against the Bulls was one of the reasons Seattle didn't win a championship during that era. After all, in the simplest terms, if the Sonics had a better record against the Bulls in '96, they would have won a title.

Just like if USC had a better record against MSU in the tourney this year, they would be in the title game against UNC.

OK, that might be a stretch.

Edwin said...

Buy Kamagra
Earn Google
Viagra Cialis
Cheap Kamagra
Cheap Viagra
Cheap Cialis
Make Money on Google
M65 Jacket
M65 Field Jacket
Airline Dog Carrier
Airline Dog Carriers
Viagra Cialis
Earn Google
Airline Dog Carrier
Airline Dog Carriers
Airline Approved Dog Carriers
ED Hardy Wholesale
Copy DVD Software
How to Send Fax
14k Yellow Gold
Redneck Costume
14k Gold Heart
Tandem Baby Stroller

Love tiffany said...

Fitch store in general abercrombie and fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, ezra fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the abercrombie is obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand hollister, including abercrombie mens and abercrombie womens, abercrombie and fitch clothing, Ruehl No.925. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, abercrombie outlet is all over the world, of course, is also expected to 2009 New Arrivals,abercrombie hoodiesabercrombie hoodies
abercrombie sweatersabercrombie sweatersabercrombie jeansabercrombie jeansabercrombie t shirtsabercrombie t shirtsabercrombie jacketsabercrombie jacketsabercrombie saleabercrombie sale

nikestars said...

Nike Outlet & Adidas Outlet expand Nba all star shoes online, we assure you top quality but low enough price. Complete in styles, and update new products everyday! Hot elling,free and fast shipping for you!Here sell completes of Nike Basketball shoes, Adidas Basketball shoes, Reebok shoes and Asics shoes. That is, NBA all star shoes are offered at low price, timely shipping. Several payment terms for convenience. All NBA basketball shoes with complete sizes, colors, and styles to meet your needs.

Anonymous said...

To establish a new effective method,tiffany jewelry,tiffany and Co,Welcome to read following news:I like it!links of london,tiffany jewelry sale